Action implies a close connection between objects. All persons are entitled to act; but the manner of action of each is different. The actor maybe described as a man; but the term "man" refers to the whole human species, and so a woman is an actor too. But if the term "man" expressly refers to the male, it should be taken to be so.
There are some who believe that a woman cannot own property; but she can do so; only she is second to man; but what belongs specially to her is the power to bless and to remain chaste.
A further discussion on the subject maybe read at:
http://www.narachphilosophy.com/the_problem_of_action.htm
(You may click on the link above or type the complete URL address into your browser)
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment